Grey Area

Welcome to the Logical Harmony Grey Area Brand List!

Logical Harmony has reached out to the following brands and has only received unclear responses about whether or not their products are cruelty-free. Being on this list does not mean that these brands test on animals, but it also doesn’t necessarily mean that they are cruelty-free either.

It means that we require additional information in order to add these brands to the Cruelty-Free Brand List. In these cases, Logical Harmony has asked these brands for that additional information or clarification but has not received it. Because of this, these brands will not be promoted on Logical Harmony. However, choose what is best for yourself.

Curious about a brand that’s been on the Grey Area List for a long time?

We do reach back out to brands and do our best to get as many as possible on to the Cruelty-Free Brand List, however, sometimes brands need to hear from you, their customers, to know that it’s important. If you have seen a brand on this list for some time, please send them an email or a tweet and let them know that you’d love to see them on the Logical Harmony Cruelty-Free Brand List.

Want to search this list?

Press Ctrl + F on Windows or Command + F on a Mac to open a search box. Type in the brand name you wish to find and hit “Enter”. If the brand is listed, your browser should scroll to it automatically.


Grey Area Brands

Logical Harmony has reached out to the following brands and has only received unclear responses about whether or not their products are cruelty-free. Additional information is needed to determine the cruelty-free status of these brands.

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

#

  • None

A

 

  • AB Crew (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Alexandria Professional (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Alpha Hydrox (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Alterna (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Annabelle (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Artís (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

B

  • Beauti Control  (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Beautiful Curls (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • BH Cosmetics (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Boots No7 (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Boscia
  • Bronx Colors (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)

Back to top

C

  • CATRICE (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Chemistry Brand, The (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Chi Chi Cosmetics (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Coastal Scents (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Colour B4  (Will not start the process to be listed on LH and will only provide a blanket statement on animal testing that did not give enough details about their testing practices to determine if they are cruelty-free or not.)
  • Cuticura (Will not start the process to be listed on LH and will only provide a blanket statement on animal testing, requests to answer specific questions were met only with a blanket statement that did not give enough details about their testing practices to determine if they are cruelty-free or not.)

Back to top

D

  • Davines (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Deciem (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Deep Steep (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Dinair Airbrush Makeup (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)
  • DivaCup (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)
  • Dollar Shave Club (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to, is owned by a parent company that tests on animals)
  • DoTerra (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

E

  • Elemis (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Essence (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

F

  • Fenty Beauty (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, their FAQ page is not detailed enough to be sure of their cruelty-free status, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Formula X (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Fountain (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Fragrant Jewels (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)

Back to top

G

  • Girlactik Beauty (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Glossier (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Godrej UK Limited (Will not start the process to be listed on LH and will only provide a blanket statement on animal testing, requests to answer specific questions were met only with a blanket statement that did not give enough details about their testing practices to determine if they are cruelty-free or not.)

Back to top

H

  • H&M (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Hada Labo Tokyo (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Hard Candy (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Harry’s (will only provide a generic statement on animal testing and will not start the process to be added on Logical Harmony)
  • HIF (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Holika Holika (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Honest Company, The (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Honest Beauty (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Hylamide (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

I

  • IMAN Cosmetics (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Inecto (will not start the process to be listed on LH and will only provide a blanket statement on animal testing, requests to answer specific questions were met only with a blanket statement that did not give enough details about their testing practices to determine if they are cruelty-free or not.)
  • It Cosmetics (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

J

  • Jane Scrivner (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Julep (have received multiple responses that are unclear, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

K

  • Kari Gran (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Kate Spade (unclear response about animal testing practices as required by law and through 3rd parties, reaching out for more clarification)
  • Klorane (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Koh Gen Do (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Kryolan Professional Make-up (Had a very clear stance on animal testing. Some readers have reported that they have been told the brand is testing when required by law, working to try and get a clear response on this.)

Back to top

L

  • L.A. Girl (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)
  • L.O.V (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)
  • LAFACE (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Lise Watier (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Lumene (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)

Back to top

M

  • Makeup Revolution (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Mally (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Marc Anthony (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Milk Makeup (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Missha US (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • MONQ (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Montagne Jeunesse (have heard rumors that they are selling in China, the brand used to provide a clear stance on animal testing, they have been unresponsive to recent communication)
  • Morphe (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices)
  • Motives Cosmetics (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

N

  • Neoteric Cosmetics (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Niod (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • NKD SKN (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Nudestix
  • Nuxe (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • NYM – Not Your Mother’s (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

O

  • Ocean Potion (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Ordinary, The (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Organic Surge (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

P

  • PHB Ethical Beauty (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Phytomer Group Brands  (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Prtty Peaushun (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

Q

  • None

Back to top

R

  • Rock Your Hair (used to provide a very clear stance but will no longer do so, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Rodan + Fields (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

S

  • Saint Francis Organics
  • Sapadilla
  • Sei Bella (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Soap & Glory (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Stemm (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Stowaway Cosmetics  (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Sukin

Back to top

T

  • Taya Beauty
  • Timeless Skin Care (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)
  • Three Cosmetics
  • Trind Cosmetics
  • Tubby Todd (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, does not wish to move forward with the requirements to be listed on Logical Harmony)

Back to top

U

  • None

Back to top

V

  • Vintage Cosmetic Company, The
  • Vita Liberata (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

W

  • White RX (Was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

X

  • Xen-Tan

Back to top

Y

  • Young Living (was unable to provide a clear statement on animal testing practices, requests for clarification have not been responded to)

Back to top

Z

  • None

Back to top

Want to search this list?

Press Ctrl + F on Windows or Command + F on a Mac to open a search box. Type in the brand name you wish to find and hit “Enter”. If the brand is listed, your browser should scroll to it automatically.

Subscribe Here

We'll send you weekly recaps & more!

view our privacy policy
Powered by ConvertKit