MAC Cosmetics Is No Longer Cruelty Free

MAC Cosmetics Is No Longer Cruelty Free

For a long time, one of the most well-known cruelty free brands has been MAC Cosmetics. It was also a common rumor in the vegan community that all their products are also vegan.  Sadly, MAC Cosmetics is no longer cruelty free.

Known for their bright and bold collections as well as their wide range of classic shades, MAC seems to have something to offer to everyone. Staying up to date on what companies are animal friendly is a big priority for me. I only purchase vegan items, and I don’t want to buy any product that has caused harm to any animals. Even if I have checked with a company in the past, I email them again every couple of months to see if anything has changed in their response that might effect their status.

MAC Cosmetics is owned by Estee Lauder. This cosmetics giant has openly tested on animals for a long time and has recently come under fire for conducting secret tests on cosmetics in China. It was this controversy that sparked me to check in with MAC about their status as a cruelty free company who offers vegan options. By some standards, MAC being owned by Estee Lauder is enough to not consider them cruelty free. With a parent company that supports animal testing, any profit MAC makes does then support animal cruelty. However, I’ve always found it best to support the animal friendly brands and let people make their own decisions about the parent companies.

Sadly, in my recent response from MAC, I noticed a change that effects their status as a cruelty free company. In order for Logical Harmony to promote a company as cruelty free, I want to make sure that there is no testing on animals at any point during the production of the products or in the materials used to create the products. This includes by the company itself or third parties that may provide ingredients. If a company can’t give a straight response to those questions, I don’t endorse them and I don’t feature them on Logical Harmony.

Normally I post the entire email response from companies, but this email from MAC has a disclosure that prohibits me from doing so without permission. I have emailed asking for permission to copy the entire email but have received no reply. So I am only going to re-post one sentence here, and it’s the only sentence that matters.

M.A.C has a longstanding policy to not test on animals, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law.

“Except when required by law” is a phrase often used by brands who are selling their products in markets, such as China, that do require animal testing to sell there. Since these tests are done by a 3rd party, the brands often still try to claim to be cruelty free. This means that MAC, long known for being cruelty free, does test on animals. I emailed them back asking for clarification on what the terms for “required by law” are but have not received a reply. I also noticed that while PETA has endorsed them in the past, MAC has been removed from their list of companies who don’t test on animals. It’s not on the list of companies who do test, but it being removed from the don’t test list says a lot.

Because of this response, Logical Harmony will no longer be featuring any MAC Cosmetics products. All previous posts featuring MAC will be deleted or have the brand removed from the post. This just shows how important it is to support the vegan cosmetic companies out there. Cruelty free may mean no testing on animals, but there are animal ingredients used in the production that do cause harm to animals to produce. “Cruelty free” is far from actually being free from cruelty to animals. Cruelty free products are featured on Logical Harmony as a step for people who are concerned about becoming animal friendly but aren’t ready to transition to vegan cosmetics.

So what can you do?

  • If you are concerned about buying animal friendly cosmetics, please no longer purchase MAC items.
  • If you are a cruelty free or animal friendly blogger, please don’t feature MAC on your blog anymore. Please do a post about their change in testing policies and spread the word to your readers!
  • Promote this post on social networking sites to let your friends know!
  • Let your friends who use MAC know about the change!
  • I urge you to contact MAC yourself and ask them to change their stance on animal testing!

I also urge you all to consider trying vegan cosmetics brands. There are so many out there who produce amazing products without any harm to animals!

Edited on March 16, 2012 to add : If you are interested in letting MAC know how you feel about this change, please check out this post from Phyrra – Heartbroken by MAC. In it, she gives an excellent letter template for you to submit to MAC!

Subscribe Here

We'll send you weekly recaps & more!

Powered by ConvertKit

94 comments for “MAC Cosmetics Is No Longer Cruelty Free

  1. Ashleigh
    Friday - May 27, 2016 at 6:02 am

    I don’t understand why it’s so hard for them to pull out of China. The body shop is refusing to sell in China and they are currently in negotiations with several agencies as well as the Chinese government to abolish their policy of animal testing….what are MAC doing other than making money? Loreal being the parent company of body shop have also agreed to have all of their companies and subcompanies animal testing free in 2020. Which while it’s still too far in my opinion, at least it’s a step in the right direction! With so many companies opting for a cruelty free product, I don’t see why MAC are so far behind the times!

  2. Tuesday - July 22, 2014 at 6:49 am

    While I’m not a vegan (my body has pitched ever-loving shitfits every time I’ve tried. I mean severe illnesses, wild mood swings etc. Not just short term either) I do my best to do as little harm as possible (no fur, and if I do have something leather it’s ancient as hell and from a secondhand shop so no company gets a profit from me). What a shame that MAC and benefit, two former favorites, do testing. I struggled with a severe depressive episode(I don’t take Big Pharma meds for my depression, only herbals now) that led to me not giving two shits about cosmetics or taking care of myself for nearly ten years. I was all set to go back to those brands, but they won’t get a penny until they and their parent company stop testing.

    I’m not perfect, but animal testing is where I draw a hard line. It isn’t necessary.

    • Friday - July 25, 2014 at 6:13 pm

      I agree. It’s hard for anyone to justify animal testing for cosmetics. There simply is no need.

  3. cg100
    Tuesday - April 8, 2014 at 12:49 am

    It’s interesting, because one thing I’ve noticed that on Youtube for example in the comments section, everyone seems to be against animal testing. Which is wonderful, don’t get me wrong. But it’s just interesting that you’ll see people leave comments when people use certain brands, yet I can’t recall even once seeing any comments about MAC. I mean, perhaps people just don’t realize it’s changed, but I can’t believe that-it’s been off Peta’s list for ages now, this article is 2 years old-it’s definitely no secret. So it almost seems to me that when it comes to Mac, certain people that otherwise claim to be against animal testing seem to almost turn the other cheek so to speak. I know alot of people think that Mac is like the holy grail of all makeup, which it’s not IMO anyway, plus they see all these well-known beauty gurus & youtubers they love using it, & like I said, I just distinctly get the feeling that certain people just are turning the other cheek when it comes to Mac. I don’t know if it’s just me or what that feels that way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *